From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Honey v. U.S. Marshals Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1992 (JEB) (D.D.C. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-1992 (JEB)

03-11-2013

VICTOR CARL HONEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Victor Honey filed a three-sentence pro se Complaint in D.C. Superior Court on October 4, 2012. He alleged that the United States Marshals Service abused process in connection with a landlord-tenant case in Superior Court. See ECF No. 1 (Notice of Removal), Attach. 2 (Complaint). After USMS removed the case to this Court, it filed a Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 4. On January 17, 2013, the Court issued a Minute Order directing Plaintiff to respond to the Motion by February 8 or risk the Court's deeming the matter conceded. When Plaintiff failed to do so, the Court issued a longer Order citing Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C. Cir. 1988), and instructing Plaintiff to file a response by March 6 or risk dismissal. See ECF No. 6. Plaintiff has still not responded.

The Court will, therefore, treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without prejudice. A contemporaneous Order will so state.

____________________

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Honey v. U.S. Marshals Serv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Mar 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-1992 (JEB) (D.D.C. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Honey v. U.S. Marshals Serv.

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR CARL HONEY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-1992 (JEB) (D.D.C. Mar. 11, 2013)