Opinion
11612 Index 602236/04
06-04-2020
John HON, et al., Plaintiffs–Respondents, v. PRINCE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC, et al., Defendants. Roug Kang Wang, et al., Nonparty–Appellants.
Wang Law Office, PLLC, Flushing (Jean Wang of counsel), for appellants. Aronauer & Yudell, LLP, New York (Joseph Aronauer of counsel), for respondents.
Wang Law Office, PLLC, Flushing (Jean Wang of counsel), for appellants.
Aronauer & Yudell, LLP, New York (Joseph Aronauer of counsel), for respondents.
Renwick, J.P., Gische, Webber, Oing, Moulton, JJ.
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Kathryn E. Freed, J.), entered January 23, 2019, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs' motion for an extension of their judgment lien on the subject property by 300 days, from January 30, 2019 through November 26, 2019, unanimously dismissed, as academic, with costs.
The expiration of the lien extension period renders the propriety of its extension academic (see Matter of Pious Socy. of St. Paul v. Goldhaber, 35 A.D.2d 674, 314 N.Y.S.2d 967 [2d Dept. 1970] ). Similarly, the other prong of plaintiffs' motion, for an extension of the lien until the Sheriff's sale had taken place, was, as Supreme Court recognized, mooted by the conduct and completion of the Sheriff's sale.