From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Homer v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
22-CV-2033 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2033 (LTS)

07-11-2022

MICHAEL HOMER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN OR JANE DOE, M.D.; SUPERINTENDENT, DOWNSTATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge:

By order dated April 4, 2022, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Homer v. Doe

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 11, 2022
22-CV-2033 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Homer v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOMER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN OR JANE DOE, M.D.; SUPERINTENDENT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 11, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2033 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 11, 2022)