Opinion
SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. RE-18-147
02-10-2020
HOMEBRIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. Plaintiff, v. PAMELA A AUBE AKA PAMELA AUBE AND RICHARD AUBE Defendants AND DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY-INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, STATE OF MAINE-MAINE REVENUE SERVICES AND MAINE DEPRTMENT OF LABOR/BUREAU OF UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION Parties in Interest
For PII Dept of US Treasury: Andrew Lizotte, Esq. For PII State of Maine: Kevin J. Crosman, AAG For Plaintiff: Loraine Hite, Esq.; Gregory Braun, Esq.; Ashley Janotta, Esq.; Benjamin Cirrinone, Esq.; and Matthew Grouter, Esq. Defendant(s): Pro-Se Litigants
For PII Dept of US Treasury: Andrew Lizotte, Esq.
For PII State of Maine: Kevin J. Crosman, AAG For Plaintiff: Loraine Hite, Esq.; Gregory Braun, Esq.;
Ashley Janotta, Esq.; Benjamin Cirrinone, Esq.;
and Matthew Grouter, Esq. Defendant(s): Pro-Se Litigants STATE OF MAINE
CUMBERLAND, ss.
ORDER PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE
TITLE TO REAL ESTATE INVOLVED
Before the Court is Plaintiff, Homebridge Financial Services, Inc.'s Motion in Limine seeking to admit a certain business record pursuant to M.R. Evid. 803(6) and 902(11). To the extent the information and figures integrated into the record were created by a third party, and seek to be admitted for its truth, the affiant must demonstrate "sufficient knowledge of both businesses' regular practices to demonstrate the reliability and trustworthiness of the information" therein. KeyBank Nat'l Ass'n v. Estate of Quint, 2017 ME 237, ¶ 13, 176 A.3d.
With no opposition filed, but because further witness testimony is required, Plaintiff's Motion is hereby DENIED. Dated: 2/10/2020
/s/_________
MaryGay Kennedy, Justice
Maine Superior Court