From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Home Insurance Co. v. Sentry Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1985
461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84-2091.

January 16, 1985.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Broward County, James M. Reasbeck, J.

Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley Casey, Miami, and Hoffmann Burris, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Jose I. Astigarraga of Steel, Hector Davis, Miami, for respondent-Sentry Insurance and Michael Schiffrin of Schultz Hollander, Miami, for respondent-Travel Tours.


Home Insurance Company of Illinois, via petition for writ of common law certiorari, seeks the review of an order denying its motion to dismiss, saying that it represents a departure from the essential requirements of law. We accept jurisdiction upon authority of Van Bibber v. Hartford Acc. Indem. Ins. Co., 439 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1983); Stel-Den of America, Inc. v. Roof Structures, Inc., 438 So.2d 882 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); and Beta Eta House Corp. v. Gregory, 230 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970).

It was error to allow the joinder of a liability insurer in an action prior to the entry of judgment against the person who is insured under the terms of the liability policy.

We quash the order in question upon authority of Van Bibber and Section 627.7262, Florida Statutes (1982).

Certiorari granted.

HERSEY, GLICKSTEIN and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Home Insurance Co. v. Sentry Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jan 16, 1985
461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Home Insurance Co. v. Sentry Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:HOME INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, PETITIONER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jan 16, 1985

Citations

461 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Hartford Acc. Indem. v. U.S.C.P. Co.

Id. at 59. Notwithstanding this court's decision in Chalfonte Development Corporation, and without the…

Canadian Home Ins. Co. v. Norris

130(a)(3), Fla.R.App.P. However, because adequate relief cannot be obtained on plenary appeal and because the…