From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Home Indem. v. Hyplains Beef

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 13, 1996
89 F.3d 850 (10th Cir. 1996)

Summary

holding that the plain meaning of "necessary suspension" requires a "complete cessation" of business operations

Summary of this case from H & H Hospitality LLC v. Discover Specialty Ins. Co.

Opinion

No. 95-3343.

June 13, 1996.

D.Kan., 893 F.Supp. 987.


DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Home Indem. v. Hyplains Beef

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 13, 1996
89 F.3d 850 (10th Cir. 1996)

holding that the plain meaning of "necessary suspension" requires a "complete cessation" of business operations

Summary of this case from H & H Hospitality LLC v. Discover Specialty Ins. Co.

In Hawkins v. Maynard, 89 F.3d 850 (10th Cir. 1996) (unpublished table opinion), the court noted that "[a] prisoner does not have an absolute right to be present at his civil trial or pretrial proceedings."

Summary of this case from Ajaj v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
Case details for

Home Indem. v. Hyplains Beef

Case Details

Full title:Home Indem. Co. v. Hyplains Beef, L.C

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jun 13, 1996

Citations

89 F.3d 850 (10th Cir. 1996)

Citing Cases

Kocsis v. Kendall

To earn his "day in court," Kocsis must convince the Court that notwithstanding concerns of docket control,…

Wimberly v. McKune

Instead, we perceive that the Tenth Circuit has keenly avoided making the determination as to the newly…