From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Homann v. O'Grady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1958
6 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Opinion

July 8, 1958


In an action to enjoin, inter alia, the picketing of a place of business, the appeal is from an order granting a motion for an injunction pendente lite. Order reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to the Special Term for a hearing as to whether the injunction should issue. The affidavit of the union organizer denied that he had ever demanded that respondent, the employer, sign a union contract. An issue of fact as to the existence of a labor dispute exists which cannot be determined without a hearing. ( Wood v. O'Grady, 307 N.Y. 532; Palermo v. Motto, 283 App. Div. 746.) Nolan, P.J., Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Wenzel, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order on the opinion of the court at Special Term. ( 11 Misc.2d 592.)


Summaries of

Homann v. O'Grady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 8, 1958
6 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)
Case details for

Homann v. O'Grady

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HOMANN, Respondent, v. JOHN M. O'GRADY, Individually and as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1958

Citations

6 A.D.2d 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1958)

Citing Cases

K.P.S. Restaurant v. Browne

Should Local 164 refuse such co-operation, a further application may be made, though apparently even in that…