From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOLZMAN v. VAN DE CAR

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Feb 21, 2002
24881 (Haw. Feb. 21, 2002)

Opinion

24881

February 21, 2002.

MOON, C.J., LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, RAMIL, and ACOBA, JJ.


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING


ORDER

Upon consideration of the first amended petition for a writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner David L. Holzman, Ph.D., and the papers in support, it appears that: (1) Petitioner asks this court to order the Hawaii County Reapportionment Commission to reassemble and amend the Hawaii County reapportionment plan filed on December 28, 2001; (2) mandamus relief is available to compel an official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only if the individual's claim is clear and certain, the official's duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from doubt, and no other remedy is available. Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Haw. 109, 929 P.2d 1359 (1996); and (3) Petitioner fails to meet the standard for the issuance of a writ of mandamus. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to Petitioner seeking relief in the circuit court.


Summaries of

HOLZMAN v. VAN DE CAR

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Feb 21, 2002
24881 (Haw. Feb. 21, 2002)
Case details for

HOLZMAN v. VAN DE CAR

Case Details

Full title:DR. DAVID L. HOLZMAN, Ph.D., on behalf of himself and persons similarly…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Feb 21, 2002

Citations

24881 (Haw. Feb. 21, 2002)