In Holzle, this Court concluded that a plaintiff's privacy rights under HIPAA should be deemed waived just as the Court of Appeals deemed the physician-patient privilege waived in Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287, 294, 303 N.Y.S.2d 858, 250 N.E.2d 857 [1969].
Summary of this case from Charlap v. KhanMay 24, 2005.
Disclosure — Medical Records and Reports — Authorization permitting defense counsel to interview plaintiff's nonparty treating physicians post-note of issue.
In Holzle, this Court concluded that a plaintiff's privacy rights under HIPAA should be deemed waived just as the Court of Appeals deemed the physician-patient privilege waived in Koump v. Smith, 25 N.Y.2d 287, 294, 303 N.Y.S.2d 858, 250 N.E.2d 857 [1969].
Summary of this case from Charlap v. KhanFull title:HOLZLE v. HEALTHCARE SERVS. GROUP, INC
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date published: May 24, 2005
The Appellate Division has concluded that "`courts should not become involved in post-note of issue trial…
Romanello v. Intesa Sanpaolo, S.P.A.Instead, patients who perceive themselves aggrieved by non-compliance with HIPAA are relegated to filing a…