Holz v. Coates Motor Co.

1 Citing case

  1. Dewan v. Ford Motor Co.

    363 Ill. App. 3d 365 (Ill. App. Ct. 2005)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that actual damages were properly alleged where the plaintiffs sued to recover for the diminished value of a car

    Finally, Ford argues that, even if it had refused to repair or been unable to repair the plaintiffs car, the problem with the sensors was too insignificant to warrant a legal remedy. However, the cases Ford relies on, Verb, Holz v. Coates Motor Co., 206 Va. 894, 147 S.E.2d 152 (1966), and Iskander v. Ford Motor Co., 59 Ohio App. 2d 325, 394 N.E.2d 1017 (1978), are distinguishable. In Verb, the complaint failed to sufficiently allege the diminished value of the product.