Opinion
6:21-CV-239
05-04-2021
GARY ARTHUR HOLYOKE, v. MARIA HOLYOKE et al., Defendants.
APPEARANCES: Gary Arthur Holyoke Plaintiff, Pro Se 811 Court Street, #320 Utica, NY 13502
APPEARANCES: Gary Arthur Holyoke
Plaintiff, Pro Se
811 Court Street, #320
Utica, NY 13502 OF COUNSEL: DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge ORDER ON REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
Pro se plaintiff Gary Arthur Holyoke ("plaintiff") filed this action against his mother and twenty-six others alleging that his family has mistreated him and that his doctors have mis-diagnosed him.
On April 9, 2021, U.S. Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks granted plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis for the purpose of an initial review. Dkt. No. 7. Judge Dancks also advised by Report & Recommendation that plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with federal pleading standards. Id. Plaintiff has filed objections to the Report & Recommendation. Dkt. No. 9.
Upon de novo review of the portions to which plaintiff has objected, the Report & Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
Therefore, it is
ORDERED that
1. The Report & Recommendation is ADOPTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 4, 2021
Utica, New York.
/s/_________
David N. Hurd
U.S. District Judge