From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holtzman v. Goodman

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
May 2, 1944
323 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)

Opinion

Gen. No. 42,909. (Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion filed May 2, 1944

FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER, § 54subsequent lessee as proper party to bring action. In action in forcible detainer to secure possession of leased property, where evidence showed that owner of property, upon termination of defendant's lease, immediately leased such property to plaintiff, held that since the owner had relinquished any right which he might have had to possession of the premises, the plaintiff was the proper and only party entitled to institute the proceedings and he could sue to recover possession without notice or demand on the defendant.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. SAMUEL HELLER, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the second division, first district, this court at the December term, 1944;

Eugene A. Weinberg, for appellant.

Edward L.S. Arkema and Ira Jacobs, for appellee;

Carl N. Howig, of counsel.


Not to be published in full. Opinion filed May 2, 1944.


Summaries of

Holtzman v. Goodman

Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District
May 2, 1944
323 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
Case details for

Holtzman v. Goodman

Case Details

Full title:Louis Holtzman, Trading as Tower Currency Exchange, Appellee, v. Julius L…

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois, Chicago, First District

Date published: May 2, 1944

Citations

323 Ill. App. 276 (Ill. App. Ct. 1944)
55 N.E.2d 104