From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holtsinger v. Voros

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-03-0732-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CIV S-03-0732-MCE-CMK-P.

February 22, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On January 21, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 21, 2010, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 275) is denied.


Summaries of

Holtsinger v. Voros

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 22, 2010
No. CIV S-03-0732-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Holtsinger v. Voros

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOLTSINGER, Plaintiff, v. TANYA VOROS, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 22, 2010

Citations

No. CIV S-03-0732-MCE-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2010)