From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holton v. Ward

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 31, 2015
SC: 149230 (Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

SC: 149230

03-31-2015

JAMES R. HOLTON and NANCY M. HOLTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CAROLE L. WARD, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.


Order

149230 & (77)(80)(88) Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein, Justices COA: 308454
Oakland CC: 2011-121522-CH

On order of the Court, the motion to file a response brief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 23, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for sanctions is DENIED.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 31, 2015

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Holton v. Ward

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 31, 2015
SC: 149230 (Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Holton v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. HOLTON and NANCY M. HOLTON…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

SC: 149230 (Mich. Mar. 31, 2015)