From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holton v. McLean

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Feb 24, 2023
Civil Action 22-3609 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 24, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-3609 (UNA)

02-24-2023

RAYMOND HOLTON, Plaintiff, v. CARMEN McLEAN, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

RUDOLPH CONTRERAS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

It appears that plaintiff Raymond Holton has been declared incompetent, and he brings this civil action to have The Honorable Carmen McLean, the Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, removed from his case. The complaint must be dismissed because this federal district court “lack[s] jurisdiction to review judicial decisions by . . . District of Columbia courts.” Richardson v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 83 F.3d 1513, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citations omitted); see Dorsey v. Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 709 Fed.Appx. 22 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (per curiam). Nor may this federal district court cause a Superior Court judge's recusal or reassignment.

Where, as here, subject matter jurisdiction is lacking, the Court must dismiss the case. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3). An Order is issued separately.


Summaries of

Holton v. McLean

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Feb 24, 2023
Civil Action 22-3609 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Holton v. McLean

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND HOLTON, Plaintiff, v. CARMEN McLEAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Feb 24, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 22-3609 (UNA) (D.D.C. Feb. 24, 2023)