From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holton v. Marathon

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 29, 2008
747 N.W.2d 912 (Minn. 2008)

Opinion

No. A08-78.

April 29, 2008.

Gregg B. Nelson, Nelson Law Office, Inver Grove Heights, MN, for Respondent.

Edward Q. Cassidy, Brad R. Kolling, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, P.A., St. Paul, MN, for Relators.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER


Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed December 17, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Paul H. Anderson, Associate Justice.


Summaries of

Holton v. Marathon

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 29, 2008
747 N.W.2d 912 (Minn. 2008)
Case details for

Holton v. Marathon

Case Details

Full title:Larry G. HOLTON, Respondent v. MARATHON PETROLEUM COMPANY, and ACE…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 29, 2008

Citations

747 N.W.2d 912 (Minn. 2008)