Opinion
Argued March 4, 1890
Decided March 21, 1890
C.C. Shelton for appellant.
Hy. Huffman Browne for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except HAIGHT, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Holthausen v. Pondir
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1890
120 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1890)
Summaries of
Holthausen v. Pondir
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 21, 1890
120 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1890)
Case details for
Holthausen v. Pondir
Case Details
Full title:HENRY HOLTHAUSEN, Respondent, v . JOHN PONDIR, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Mar 21, 1890
Citations
120 N.Y. 622 (N.Y. 1890)
29 N.Y. St. Rptr. 996
Citing Cases
Rosenbaum v. Podolsky
It is not necessary for a determination of this case to decide whether the bare absence in a foreign…
Hawley v. HawleyAccordingly, it is well settled that such testimony falls outside the rule of privileged communications.…