From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1989
552 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1989)

Opinion

No. 85-1185.

January 18, 1989.

Alan B. Soschin, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, and MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, STEADMAN and SCHWELB, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of appellant's petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 31, 1988, 547 A.2d 158, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before January 30, 1989.


Summaries of

Holt v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1989
552 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1989)
Case details for

Holt v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Marvin L. HOLT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 18, 1989

Citations

552 A.2d 529 (D.C. 1989)

Citing Cases

Holt v. U.S.

On appeal, he challenged his conviction on several grounds and a division of this court voted to affirm. Holt…