From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Stockman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
No. 1:04-CV-6073-MHM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:04-CV-6073-MHM-P

10-19-2012

VIRGIL E. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. D.G. STOCKMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following a settlement conference, the matter was closed on May 10, 2012. The matter is now before the undersigned pursuant to the District Judge's October 16, 2012, order issued incident to plaintiff's October 3, 2012, motion for transcripts (Doc. 198).

In his October 3, 2012, filing, plaintiff seeks a transcript of the settlement conference. According to plaintiff, it was agreed as part of the settlement that, if defendants did not pay the settlement amount, he would be able to withdraw his acceptance of the settlement and proceed with this litigation. Plaintiff states that, to date, he has not received any settlement proceeds from defendants. Defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's October 3, 2012 motion and shall address in particular plaintiff's claim that settlement proceeds have not been paid.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants shall file a response to plaintiff's October 3, 2012, motion within 15 days of the date of this order.

____________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Holt v. Stockman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
No. 1:04-CV-6073-MHM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Holt v. Stockman

Case Details

Full title:VIRGIL E. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. D.G. STOCKMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

No. 1:04-CV-6073-MHM-P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)