From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 23, 2022
351 So. 3d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1971

11-23-2022

Antonio D. HOLT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Antonio D. Holt, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Antonio D. Holt, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The Court dismisses the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as impermissibly successive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C). Petitioner made the same claim in a prior petition, which this Court denied on the merits. The instant petition is repetitious, frivolous, and an abuse of the judicial process. The Court warns Petitioner that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2022).

Ray, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 23, 2022
351 So. 3d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Holt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio D. HOLT, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

351 So. 3d 212 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)