From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 23, 2022
No. 1D22-1971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-1971

11-23-2022

Antonio D. Holt, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Antonio D. Holt, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel- Original Jurisdiction.

Antonio D. Holt, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses the petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel as impermissibly successive. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(d)(6)(C). Petitioner made the same claim in a prior petition, which this Court denied on the merits. The instant petition is repetitious, frivolous, and an abuse of the judicial process. The Court warns Petitioner that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279, Fla. Stat. (2022).

Ray, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holt v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Nov 23, 2022
No. 1D22-1971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Holt v. State

Case Details

Full title:Antonio D. Holt, Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Nov 23, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-1971 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2022)