From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 28, 2017
216 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 2D15–3388

04-28-2017

Ronald HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Connie Mederos-Jacobs of Bradenton, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Connie Mederos-Jacobs of Bradenton, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kiersten E. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Ronald Holt seeks review of his judgment and sentences for trafficking in cannabis and manufacture of marijuana. We affirm Holt's convictions without further comment. Based on the State's concession of error, we reverse the portion of Holt's sentence imposing a $50,000 fine. On remand, the trial court is required to impose the mandatory $25,000 fine under section 893.135(1)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2013), which is the applicable trafficking statute.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Holt v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Apr 28, 2017
216 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Holt v. State

Case Details

Full title:RONALD HOLT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

216 So. 3d 764 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)