From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Shoemaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01615-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01615-PAB-MEH

12-22-2011

JOSEPH HOLT, Plaintiff, v. J. SHOEMAKER, DR. FRANZE, DR. FISHdePENA, JOICE CHRUNK, DR. JOSEPH WERMERS, DR. KATHY MCBRIDE, SRG. BUENA VIDA, and OFFICER DEGROOT, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on December 22, 2011.

Defendants' Motion to Amend Case Caption [filed December 19, 2011; docket #25] is denied without prejudice. Although Defendants are not required to confer with Plaintiff under D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, the Court declines to amend the caption without Plaintiff's position on the proposed change. The Court will continue to rely on the amended complaint for the proper identity of Defendants until the Court receives notice from Plaintiff indicating otherwise.


Summaries of

Holt v. Shoemaker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Dec 22, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01615-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Holt v. Shoemaker

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH HOLT, Plaintiff, v. J. SHOEMAKER, DR. FRANZE, DR. FISHdePENA, JOICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Dec 22, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01615-PAB-MEH (D. Colo. Dec. 22, 2011)