From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Norwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Apr 30, 2019
CASE NO. 18-3284-SAC (D. Kan. Apr. 30, 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. 18-3284-SAC

04-30-2019

WILLIAM R. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. JOE NORWOOD, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At the time of filing, Plaintiff was an inmate at the El Dorado Correctional Facility-Central in El Dorado, Kansas ("EDCF"). On April 5, 2019, the Court entered a Memorandum and Order (Doc. 41) granting Plaintiff until April 26, 2019, in which to file a complete and proper amended complaint. To date, Plaintiff has failed to either file an amended complaint or to request an extension of time beyond the April 26, 2019 deadline.

Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "authorizes a district court, upon a defendant's motion, to order the dismissal of an action for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or 'a court order.'" Young v. U.S., 316 F. App'x 764, 771 (10th Cir. 2009) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)). "This rule has been interpreted as permitting district courts to dismiss actions sua sponte when one of these conditions is met." Id. (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003)). "In addition, it is well established in this circuit that a district court is not obligated to follow any particular procedures when dismissing an action without prejudice under Rule 41(b)." Young, 316 F. App'x at 771-72 (citations omitted).

Plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint within the allowed time. Therefore, Plaintiff should show cause why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that Plaintiff is granted until May 14, 2019, in which to show good cause, in writing, to the Honorable Sam A. Crow, United States District Judge, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated in Topeka, Kansas, on this 30th day of April, 2019.

s/ Sam A. Crow

SAM A. CROW

U. S. Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Holt v. Norwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Apr 30, 2019
CASE NO. 18-3284-SAC (D. Kan. Apr. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Holt v. Norwood

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM R. HOLT, Plaintiff, v. JOE NORWOOD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Date published: Apr 30, 2019

Citations

CASE NO. 18-3284-SAC (D. Kan. Apr. 30, 2019)