From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Hunt Oil Co.

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Sep 22, 2016
No. 11-16-00097-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2016)

Summary

In Hodges v. Hunt (22 Barb. 150) the question of a ratification was involved, and it was said: "A new promise made by him (an infant), after he becomes of full age, must possess all the ingredients of a complete agreement, to enable the creditor to recover."

Summary of this case from Kane v. Kane

Opinion

No. 11-16-00097-CV

09-22-2016

MICHAEL HOLT AND FRANCES HODGES, Appellants v. HUNT OIL COMPANY AND JED DENSMAN, Appellees


On Appeal from the 118th District Court Martin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 6842

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties to this appeal have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss with prejudice. The parties state that they have resolved their dispute and have agreed to dismiss all claims. The parties request that we dismiss this appeal with prejudice and tax costs against the party incurring the same. In accordance with the parties' request, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.

The joint motion to dismiss with prejudice is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. September 22, 2016

PER CURIAM Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Willson, J., and Bailey, J.


Summaries of

Holt v. Hunt Oil Co.

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Sep 22, 2016
No. 11-16-00097-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2016)

In Hodges v. Hunt (22 Barb. 150) the question of a ratification was involved, and it was said: "A new promise made by him (an infant), after he becomes of full age, must possess all the ingredients of a complete agreement, to enable the creditor to recover."

Summary of this case from Kane v. Kane
Case details for

Holt v. Hunt Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOLT AND FRANCES HODGES, Appellants v. HUNT OIL COMPANY AND JED…

Court:State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 22, 2016

Citations

No. 11-16-00097-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 22, 2016)

Citing Cases

Kuhn v. Am. Automatic Knife, Etc., Co.

No provision for service of a reply is found in the above section of the Code, and it has been uniformly held…

Kane v. Kane

We find nothing in that case inconsistent with the principle which we have already adverted to. In Hodges v.…