From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holt v. Grimes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1972
261 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1210.

April 25, 1972. Rehearing Denied May 24, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Arthur E. Huttoe, J.

Horton, Schwartz Perse, Miami, for appellants.

A.M. Schwitalla, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., PEARSON, J., and HARDING, MAJOR B., Associate Judge.


This is an appeal filed by plaintiff below seeking review of a directed verdict entered at the close of plaintiff's case. At trial the judge sustained objections to certain records which were offered into evidence, whereupon plaintiff rested as the records allegedly were necessary to the establishment of its case. The record on appeal reflects absolutely no testimony as to the mode of preparation of these records nor was the witness testifying in regard to the records in the relationship of "custodian or other qualified witness" as required by F.S. § 92.36, F.S.A. See Mastan Co. v. American Custom Homes, Inc., Fla. App. 1968, 214 So.2d 103. The trial court did not err in sustaining the objections and directing the verdict.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Holt v. Grimes

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 1972
261 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Holt v. Grimes

Case Details

Full title:HENRY HOLT ET AL., TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS THOMSON McKINNON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 24, 1972

Citations

261 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Berdecia

In other words, the witness must be “well enough acquainted with the activity to give the testimony.”…

Lifemark Hosp. of Florida v. Hurley

See Garrett v. Morris Kirschman Co., 336 So.2d 566, 569 (Fla. 1976) (unverified writing of third person is…