Opinion
2:22-cv-0710 DB P
11-07-2022
DEANGELO DESHONG HOLT, Petitioner, v. DAVID BREWER, Respondent.
ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Petitioner, a federal prisoner, seeks habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On September 15, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(1) provides, in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion....” Id. In addition, by order filed July 20, 2022, petitioner was advised “an opposition to a motion to dismiss is due within thirty days of service of the motion to dismiss[.]” (ECF No. 7 at 1.) Failure to comply with this court's Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110.
Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that, within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the action dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.