From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 9, 2013
Case No. C-08-0133 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. C-08-0133 RMW

05-09-2013

HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP., and HOLOGIC L.P., Plaintiffs, v. SENORX, INC., Defendant.

Maulik G. Shah (State Bar No. 255403) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Matthew M. Wolf (admitted pro hac vice ) John E. Nilsson (admitted pro hac vice ) ARNOLD & PORTER LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hologic, Inc., Cytyc Corporation, and Hologic L.P.


Maulik G. Shah (State Bar No. 255403)
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Matthew M. Wolf (admitted pro hac vice)
John E. Nilsson (admitted pro hac vice)
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Hologic, Inc.,
Cytyc Corporation, and Hologic L.P.

[] ORDER GRANTING THE

PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION

EXTENDING STAY OF ALL

PROCEEDINGS

[] ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' JOINT STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED THAT:

1. The stay of all proceedings and deadlines in the above captioned case is hereby extended for a period of 60 days.

It is SO ORDERED.

__________________________

Honorable Ronald M. Whyte

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
May 9, 2013
Case No. C-08-0133 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Hologic, Inc. v. SenoRx, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOLOGIC, INC., CYTYC CORP., and HOLOGIC L.P., Plaintiffs, v. SENORX, INC.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: May 9, 2013

Citations

Case No. C-08-0133 RMW (N.D. Cal. May. 9, 2013)