From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmon v. Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-0938 (RBW) (D.D.C. Sep. 2, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 14-0938 (RBW)

09-02-2014

ANTHONY ULYSSES HOLMON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On June 10, 2014, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The Court advised the plaintiff of his obligations under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this Court to respond to the motion, and specifically warned the plaintiff that, if he did not respond to the motion by July 23, 2014, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The plaintiff's deadline since has been extended to August 15, 2014. To date, the plaintiff neither has filed an opposition to the motion and nor has requested more time to do so. Accordingly, the Court will grant the defendants' motion as conceded.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/

REGGIE B. WALTON

United States District Judge
DATE: September 2, 2014


Summaries of

Holmon v. Aramark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Sep 2, 2014
Civil Action No. 14-0938 (RBW) (D.D.C. Sep. 2, 2014)
Case details for

Holmon v. Aramark

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY ULYSSES HOLMON, Plaintiff, v. ARAMARK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 14-0938 (RBW) (D.D.C. Sep. 2, 2014)