From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Wyatt Lumber Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1958
100 So. 2d 488 (La. 1958)

Opinion

No. 42170.

February 10, 1958.

APPEAL FROM ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF SABINE, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE EDWIN M. FRASER, J.

James W. Jones, Jr., Natchitoches, for plaintiffs.

Pickett Pickett, Many, for defendant-appellee.


This is a petitory action in which plaintiffs claim ownership of 160 acres of land located in Sabine Parish. The demand was rejected by the trial judge and plaintiffs appealed to this Court.

We take notice of the lack of an affirmative showing that the value of the land in contest exceeds $2000 which is essential when our appellate jurisdiction is invoked solely on that basis. In an effort to vest jurisdiction here, counsel for the respective parties entered into a stipulation of facts, after rendition of the judgment, in which it is stated that the value of the land and timber is nearly $5000.

The agreement is without effect. The appellate jurisdiction of this Court cannot be conferred by consent of the parties; it must affirmatively appear from the record. Newman v. McClure, 221 La. 556, 59 So.2d 882 and cases there cited.

It is therefore ordered that this appeal be transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, provided that the record is filed in that court within thirty days from the finality of this decree; otherwise, the appeal shall be dismissed. The costs incurred in this Court are assessed against plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Wyatt Lumber Company

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1958
100 So. 2d 488 (La. 1958)
Case details for

Holmes v. Wyatt Lumber Company

Case Details

Full title:LEE HOLMES ET AL. v. WYATT LUMBER COMPANY, INC

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 10, 1958

Citations

100 So. 2d 488 (La. 1958)
234 La. 510

Citing Cases

Holmes v. Wyatt Lumber Company

Judgment annulled and set aside and case remanded with instructions. Appeal transferred from the Supreme…

Durr v. McCaleb

At the outset it appears that we are unable to entertain the appeal. With respect to the value of the two…