From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Witchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02270-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02270-BNB

10-15-2012

REGINALD HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WITCHELL, and INDEPENDENT RECORDS, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 4, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order directing Plaintiff, Reginald Holmes, to file an amended complaint that provides an address for Defendant James Witchell and that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Holmes was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to file an amended complaint within thirty days.

On September 5, 2012, Mr. Holmes filed a letter to the Court asking that Defendant Independent Records to be served with court documents on his behalf. On September 21, 2012, Mr. Holmes filed a copy of a Denver Police Department report with a handwritten notation stating that the document includes an address for Defendant James Witchell.

Mr. Holmes has failed to file an amended complaint that complies with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within the time allowed. Therefore, the action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order.

Furthermore, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he also must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the complaint and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Mr. Holmes failed to comply with a court order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 15th day of November , 2012.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Holmes v. Witchell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02270-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Holmes v. Witchell

Case Details

Full title:REGINALD HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. JAMES WITCHELL, and INDEPENDENT RECORDS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02270-LTB (D. Colo. Oct. 15, 2012)