From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 9, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv100/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 9, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09cv100/MCR/EMT.

October 9, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiffs' document, AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT 28 U.S.C. 1346(b) — (received by the clerk of the court on October 2, 2009), was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a certificate of service as required by Rule 5(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 5.1(D) of the Local Rules of the Northern District of Florida, certifying that a copy of the document has been served upon all other parties and specifying the date and method of such service.
The document does not have a proper signature block. The typed or printed name, address, and telephone number of the party filing the document must be included with the original signature. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(a); N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(5).
The document is not double-spaced as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(3).

For these reasons, it is ORDERED that:

The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to Plaintiffs by the clerk without electronic filing.
Plaintiffs shall have until OCTOBER 16, 2009, in which to file an amended complaint that complies with the above-cited Rules.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holmes v. U.S.

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Oct 9, 2009
Case No. 3:09cv100/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 9, 2009)
Case details for

Holmes v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN F. HOLMES, SR., et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Oct 9, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09cv100/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Oct. 9, 2009)