From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 7, 2017
NO. 03-16-00741-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 03-16-00741-CR

04-07-2017

Anthony Dwayne Holmes, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 75259 , THE HONORABLE JOHN GAUNTT, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea to the court, appellant Anthony Dwayne Holmes, Jr. pled guilty and judicially confessed to aggravated robbery. See Tex. Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2). After hearing evidence, the trial court assessed punishment at confinement for twelve years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See id.§ 12.32.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81-82 (1988).

Appellant's counsel has certified to this Court that he sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a motion to assist appellant in obtaining the record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. To date, appellant has not filed a pro se response or requested an extension of time to file a response.

We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record of the plea proceeding and the punishment hearing as well as appellate counsel's brief—and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. The trial court's judgment of conviction is affirmed.

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin Affirmed Filed: April 7, 2017 Do Not Publish


Summaries of

Holmes v. State

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Apr 7, 2017
NO. 03-16-00741-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2017)
Case details for

Holmes v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony Dwayne Holmes, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Apr 7, 2017

Citations

NO. 03-16-00741-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 7, 2017)