Holmes v. State

2 Citing cases

  1. Rollins v. State

    269 S.E.2d 81 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 6 times
    In Rollins v. State, 154 Ga. App. 585 (5) (269 S.E.2d 81), where the victim was shot impairing the use of an arm and leaving scars on the body, this court said: "In our view, a jury question was presented as to whether the victim suffered `serious disfigurement.' [Cit.] `(T)he jury having found it so, we will not reverse.' [Cits.

    "[T]he jury having found it so, we will not reverse." Jarrard v. State, 152 Ga. App. 553, 555 ( 263 S.E.2d 444) (1979); Holmes v. State, 138 Ga. App. 689 ( 227 S.E.2d 471) (1976); Penland v. State, 229 Ga. 256 ( 190 S.E.2d 900) (1972). 6. Appellant's contention that the crimes of attempted armed robbery and aggravated battery merged as a matter of fact is without merit.

  2. Williams v. State

    233 S.E.2d 48 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977)   Cited 2 times

    See Ward v. State, 231 Ga. 484, 485 ( 202 S.E.2d 421). Following the enactment of the 1968 Criminal Code, this court has consistently held that an aggravated assault conviction will be approved although the battery be completed. Wells v. State, 125 Ga. App. 579 ( 188 S.E.2d 407); Thomas v. State, 128 Ga. App. 538, 541 ( 197 S.E.2d 452); Ross v. State, 131 Ga. App. 587 ( 206 S.E.2d 554); Mitchell v. State, 134 Ga. App. 376 ( 214 S.E.2d 593); Huff v. State, 135 Ga. App. 134 ( 217 S.E.2d 187); Hale v. State, 135 Ga. App. 625 ( 218 S.E.2d 643); Cloud v. State, 136 Ga. App. 244 ( 220 S.E.2d 763); Allen v. State, 137 Ga. App. 302 ( 223 S.E.2d 495); Holmes v. State, 138 Ga. App. 689 ( 227 S.E.2d 471). This enumeration is without merit. Judgment affirmed. Stolz and Shulman, JJ., concur.