From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B
May 5, 1944
17 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1944)

Opinion

May 5, 1944

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Harry N. Sandler, Judge.

George A. Gibbs, for appellant.

J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, John C. Wynn, Assistant Attorney General, and Bourke Floyd, Special Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.


Appellant, being indicted for the offense of murder in the first degree, pleaded not guilty and was convicted of murder in the first degree with recommendation to mercy.

The only question presented for our determination is whether or not the evidence was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

The evidence was to some extent conflicting and it was, therefore, the duty of the jury to reconcile the conflicts, if possible, and if this could not be done then to determine who was and who was not speaking the truth and to return a verdict upon the evidence which is believed to be true.

There was ample substantial evidence to support the verdict and judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

So ordered.

BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Holmes v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B
May 5, 1944
17 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1944)
Case details for

Holmes v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEE HOLMES v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. Division B

Date published: May 5, 1944

Citations

17 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1944)
17 So. 2d 789

Citing Cases

Hart v. State

The judgment of conviction should, therefore, be affirmed. Holmes v. State, 154 Fla. 409, 17 So.2d 789; Johns…