From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Souza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0332 GEB DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0332 GEB DAD

11-06-2012

BRIENNA HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE SOUZA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter came before the court on November 2, 2012, for hearing on plaintiff's motion to compel deposition testimony of defendant Ryan Mez. (Doc. No. 28). Stewart Katz, Esq. appeared for the moving party. Amanda Butts, Esq. appeared for defendant Ryan Mez.

For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's motion to compel deposition testimony (Doc. No. 28) is granted in its entirety;

2. The deposition of defendant Ryan Mez shall resume and be held at a reasonable time agreed upon by the parties on or before November 21, 2012; and

3. Defendant Mez shall bear the costs associated with the resumed deposition.

_________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Holmes v. Souza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-0332 GEB DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Holmes v. Souza

Case Details

Full title:BRIENNA HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE SOUZA, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0332 GEB DAD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2012)