From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Lessenberry

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 31, 1988
759 S.W.2d 37 (Ark. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-263

Opinion delivered October 31, 1988

PROHIBITION — WRIT NOT ISSUED FOR SOMETHING ALREADY DONE. — The supreme court does not issue a writ of prohibition for something that has already been done.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

Keith I. Billingsley, for appellant.

Rose Law Firm, by: Webster L. Hubbell, for Charles C. Owen.

Mark Stodola, City Attorney, and Thomas M. Carpenter, Asst. City Att'y, for Tom Dalton and the City of Little Rock.


According to the petition, the trial court has issued its order. We do not issue a writ of prohibition for something that has already been done.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Lessenberry

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 31, 1988
759 S.W.2d 37 (Ark. 1988)
Case details for

Holmes v. Lessenberry

Case Details

Full title:Toi Miller HOLMES v. The Honorable Jack L. LESSENBERRY, Circuit Judge, and…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 31, 1988

Citations

759 S.W.2d 37 (Ark. 1988)
759 S.W.2d 37

Citing Cases

Pike v. Benton Circuit Court

We have further held that we do not issue a writ of prohibition for something that has already been done.…

Oliver v. Ark. Prof. B.B

We have further held that we do not issue a writ of prohibition for something that has already been done.…