From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Harper

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.
Sep 29, 2022
Civil Action 2: 22-cv-00047 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2: 22-cv-00047

09-29-2022

HENRY JAMES HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER and PITTSBURGH POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL VEITH, Defendants.


Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy

ORDER OF COURT

MARK R. HORNAK, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2022, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Pittsburgh Police Officer Michael Veith, ECF No. 17, is granted and all claims against Defendant Veith are hereby dismissed, without leave to amend, as futile.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Warden Orlando Harper, ECF No. 29, is granted and all claims against Defendant Harper are hereby dismissed, without leave to amend, as futile.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the two Reports and Recommendation filed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on August 30, 2022, ECF No. 37 and ECF No. 38, are adopted as the Opinions of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this case closed.

Lastly, the Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Harper

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.
Sep 29, 2022
Civil Action 2: 22-cv-00047 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Holmes v. Harper

Case Details

Full title:HENRY JAMES HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER and PITTSBURGH…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.

Date published: Sep 29, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2: 22-cv-00047 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 29, 2022)