From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Estock

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 22, 2022
16cv2458-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)

Opinion

16cv2458-MMA(BLM)

09-22-2022

CHARLES HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. DR. ESTOCK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Hon. Barbara L. Major, United States Magistrate Judge.

On September 20, 2022, the Court held an attorneys-only Case Management Videoconference (“CMC”) in this matter. ECF No. 174. After speaking with counsel for both sides and conferring with District Judge Anello, the Court orders the following:

1. Plaintiff must file any motion to reopen limited discovery by October 11, 2022 . The motion must identify the specific discovery Plaintiff wants to conduct, state the reason for the requested discovery being conducted after the close of discovery, and include a specific time frame for the discovery.

2. Defendant must file any opposition to the motion by October 18, 2022 .

3. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d) (1) and no personal appearances will be required.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Holmes v. Estock

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Sep 22, 2022
16cv2458-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Holmes v. Estock

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HOLMES, Plaintiff, v. DR. ESTOCK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Sep 22, 2022

Citations

16cv2458-MMA(BLM) (S.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2022)