From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holmes v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv230

01-27-2020

GEORGE RAY HOLMES v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

George Ray Holmes, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled petition for writ of habeas corpus. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge recommending that a motion for default judgment filed by petitioner be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. The motion for default judgment (doc. no. 14) is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED January 27, 2020.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Holmes v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 27, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2020)
Case details for

Holmes v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE RAY HOLMES v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 27, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:18cv230 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 27, 2020)