Opinion
4:21-CV-01683
03-14-2024
ORDER
Matthew W. Brann, Chief United States District Judge
In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. 40) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
a. Defendant is precluded from presenting evidence concerning the settlement agreement reached between Plaintiff and Sutherland Global Logistics;
b. Defendant is precluded from introducing the pleadings of the lawsuit between Plaintiff and Sutherland Global Logistics; and
c. Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. 40) is otherwise DENIED;
2. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Relating to Dismissed Claims (Doc. 42) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
a. Plaintiff is precluded from presenting evidence concerning the hoarding of work by certain employees and the connected embarrassment she experienced;
b. Plaintiff is precluded from presenting evidence concerning Timothy McCoy's description of her work as “menial”; and
c. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence Relating to Dismissed Claims (Doc. 42) is otherwise DENIED;
3. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence of Unrelated Events (Doc. 44) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART;
a. Plaintiff is precluded from mentioning McCoy's statement concerning his wife;
b. Plaintiff is precluded from mentioning Dunmire's description of the chair throwing incident; and
c. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Unrelated Events (Doc. 44) is otherwise DENIED;
4. Defendant's Motion in Limine to Preclude Evidence in Support of Plaintiff's Claim for Punitive Damages or, in the alternative, to Bifurcate (Doc. 46) is DENIED.