and remand for a new trial. The United States Supreme Court has accorded retroactive effect to its decisions recognizing a criminal defendant's right to counsel at trial, Gideon v Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335; 83 S Ct 792; 9 L Ed 2d 799, 93 ALR2d 733 (1963) [Kitchens v Smith, 401 U.S. 847; 91 S Ct 1089; 28 L Ed 2d 519 (1971)] and Argersinger v Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25; 92 S Ct 2006; 32 L Ed 2d 530 (1972) [Berry v Cincinnati, 414 U.S. 29; 94 S Ct 193; 38 L Ed 2d 187 (1973)]; at certain arraignments, Hamilton v Alabama, 368 U.S. 52; 82 S Ct 157; 7 L Ed 2d 114 (1961) [Walton v Arkansas, 371 U.S. 28, 83 S Ct 9; 9 L Ed 2d 9 (1962)] and White v Maryland, 373 U.S. 59; 83 S Ct 1050; 10 L Ed 2d 193 (1963) [Arsenault v Massachusetts, 393 U.S. 5; 89 S Ct 35; 21 L Ed 2d 5 (1968)], at sentencing, Mempa v Rhay, 389 U.S. 128; 88 S Ct 254; 19 L Ed 2d 336 (1967) [McConnell v Rhay, 393 U.S. 2; 89 S Ct 32; 21 L Ed 2d 2 (1968)] and on appeal, Douglas v California, 372 U.S. 353; 83 S Ct 814; 9 L Ed 2d 811 (1963) [Holmes v California, 372 U.S. 710; 83 S Ct 1020; 10 L Ed 2d 126 (1963)]. In these cases, the Court, citing Linkletter v Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 639; 85 S Ct 1731; 14 L Ed 2d 601 (1965), found that the right to counsel related to "the very integrity of the fact-finding process".