Opinion
12110 Index No. 156130/15 Case No. 2020-01592
10-20-2020
Brody, O'Connor & O'Connor, New York (Iain McLoeod of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Denis C. Bartling, Westbury (Patricia McDonagh of counsel), for respondents.
Brody, O'Connor & O'Connor, New York (Iain McLoeod of counsel), for appellant.
Law Office of Denis C. Bartling, Westbury (Patricia McDonagh of counsel), for respondents.
Kapnick, J.P., Singh, Kennedy, Mendez, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Adam Silvera, J.), entered July 8, 2019, dismissing the complaint as against defendants Ragina Lashanda Sylla and Musa Syllah, pursuant to an order, same court and Justice, entered April 27, 2018, which, inter alia, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment as against Sylla and Syllah, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants established prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating an adequate nonnegligent explanation for the accident. Defendant Sylla testified that she had come to a full stop before being hit from behind by a truck, which caused her car to move forward into plaintiff's motorcycle, which was stopped in front of her (see Tejeda v. Aifa, 134 A.D.3d 549, 22 N.Y.S.3d 18 [1st Dept. 2015] ; Williams v. Hamilton, 116 A.D.3d 421, 422, 982 N.Y.S.2d 483 [1st Dept. 2014] ).
In opposition, plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as the video submitted by plaintiff depicts Sylla's car being pushed by a truck into plaintiff's motorcycle causing the accident.