From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holm v. Lorenzen

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 18, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00031-RPM (D. Colo. Jul. 18, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00031-RPM.

July 18, 2008


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS


Upon consideration of plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims with Prejudice [70], filed on July 3, 2008, it is ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the following claims (as set forth in the complaint): FOUR (negligence, general), FIGHT (negligent hiring), incorporating that claim into Claim SEVEN, NINE (negligent misrepresentation resulting in financial loss), ELEVEN (concealment), incorporating that claim into Claim TEN, THIRTEEN (promissory estoppel), FOURTEEN (negligent infliction of emotional distress) and the following subclaims contained within Claim FIVE (negligence per se): all federal analogues to state statutes cited, third degree assault, harassment, child abuse, obscenity, prostitution, promoting sexual immorality, indecent exposure, providing sexually explicit materials harmful to children, false imprisonment, first degree kidnapping, unlawful sexual contact, and sexual assault is granted


Summaries of

Holm v. Lorenzen

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 18, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-cv-00031-RPM (D. Colo. Jul. 18, 2008)
Case details for

Holm v. Lorenzen

Case Details

Full title:DARCY LEE HOLM and DONNA MARIE HOLM, Plaintiffs, v. DAVID KIRK LORENZEN…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 18, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-cv-00031-RPM (D. Colo. Jul. 18, 2008)