From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1088 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1088 MCE KJM P.

September 30, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a denial of parole. On August 20, 2009, an inmate purporting to act on petitioner's behalf filed a motion to dismiss, claiming that petitioner had been paroled.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, within twenty days of the date of this order, petitioner inform the court if he desires to continue with this action. Failure to respond will result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Holloway v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 30, 2009
No. CIV S-09-1088 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)
Case details for

Holloway v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HOLLOWAY, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 30, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1088 MCE KJM P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 30, 2009)