From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. NetBank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 9, 2014
No. 12-2960-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 9, 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-2960-STA-tmp

01-09-2014

RAYNUS B. HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. NETBANK, EVERBANK, EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, MURPHY, DEZONIA & WEBB, SHAPIRO & KIRSCH, LLP, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., KATHLEEN R. WEBB, and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM

On November 2, 2012, Plaintiff Raynus B. Holloway ("Plaintiff") filed a pro se complaint (D.E. #1) and Motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis (D.E. # 2). The Complaint seeks to prohibit a nonjudicial foreclosure of real property located at 7545 Britney Woods Circle, Bartlett, Tennessee. The Court granted Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on November 5, 2012. On March 28, 2013, the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham for case management and for all pretrial matters for determination and/or report and recommendation as appropriate.

The Magistrate Judge made a sua sponte review of plaintiff's Complaint to determine whether the complaint should be dismissed because it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On December 10, 2013, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report & Recommendation (D.E. # 5), recommending that the Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief.

The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Consistent with the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S. THOMAS ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Holloway v. NetBank

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 9, 2014
No. 12-2960-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 9, 2014)
Case details for

Holloway v. NetBank

Case Details

Full title:RAYNUS B. HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff, v. NETBANK, EVERBANK, EVERHOME MORTGAGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 9, 2014

Citations

No. 12-2960-STA-tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jan. 9, 2014)

Citing Cases

Orlowski v. Bates

When the predicate act for a civil RICO claim would need to meet the requirements of Rule 9(b), the civil…

In re Yuska

In short, Nixon's position is illogical and flies in the face of established precedent. Nixon v. Phillipoff ,…