From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Holloway v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 1999
Civil Action No. 99-CV-3270 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 1999)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 99-CV-3270.

October 7, 1999.


ORDER — MEMORANDUM


AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 1999, Counts I, II, and III, to the extent they rely on the 42 U.S.C. § 1981, or the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth and Thirteenth amendments to the United States Constitution, are dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). The motion to dismiss as to claims asserted against former police chief commissioner Richard Neal is denied by virtue of the allegation that he "knew" of his subordinates' purported discriminatory conduct. Complaint, ¶ 51. The alternative allegation that "he should have known" is insufficient and is, sua sponte, stricken.

These claims were withdrawn in plaintiff's response to defendants' motion to dismiss.

The Complaint states a claim for supervisor liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 adequate to withstand a motion to dismiss.See Dawes v. Philadelphia Gas Commission, 421 F. Supp. 806, 821 (E.D.Pa. 1976) ("where an individual . . . is alleged to be liable . . . by virtue of his position as supervisor of those directly responsible, the Complaint nevertheless must aver `personal involvement' on the part of the supervisor, at least to the extent that he knew of, and acquiesced in, the unconstitutional conduct of his subordinates.'") (citation omitted).


Summaries of

Holloway v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 7, 1999
Civil Action No. 99-CV-3270 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 1999)
Case details for

Holloway v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS HOLLOWAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 7, 1999

Citations

Civil Action No. 99-CV-3270 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 1999)