Holloman v. State

Full title: CARVEL HOLLOMAN, PETITIONER, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Court: Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 2, 1988

525 So. 2d 875 (Fla. 1988)

Opinion

No. 71296.

June 2, 1988.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict of Decisions; Fourth District — Case No. 4-86-2583.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Margaret Good, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Diane E. Leeds and Celia A. Terenzio, Asst. Attys. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Holloman v. State, 511 So.2d 1096 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), which expressly and directly conflicts with Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla. 1987), and Morganti v. State, 524 So.2d 641 (Fla. 1988), quashing 510 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinions in Shull and Morganti.

It is so ordered.

McDONALD, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.