From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollman v. Shartle

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 26, 2010
CASE NO. 4:09 CV 2836 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:09 CV 2836.

March 26, 2010


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER


Pro se petitioner, Elijah Hollman, filed the above-captioned petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. At the time he filed his petition, Petitioner was incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Elkton, Ohio. Petitioner complained that he was being retaliated against because he filed requests for administrative remedies. His petition seeks solely injunctive relief, i.e., that he be transferred to a Residential Re-entry Center ("RRC") pursuant to the Second Chance Act of 2007.

Petitioner has been transferred to an RRC. Accordingly, the petition before the Court is now moot.

Petitioner is now housed at a Community Correction Center in Raleigh, North Carolina.

Conclusion

Based on the foregoing, the captioned petition is dismissed as moot. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hollman v. Shartle

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 26, 2010
CASE NO. 4:09 CV 2836 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2010)
Case details for

Hollman v. Shartle

Case Details

Full title:ELIJAH HOLLMAN, Petitioner, v. WARDEN J.T. SHARTLE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 26, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. 4:09 CV 2836 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 26, 2010)