From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hollman v. Hornerxpress

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 25, 2011
Case No: 8:10-CV-2582-T-30TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No: 8:10-CV-2582-T-30TBM.

February 25, 2011


ORDER


THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Report and Recommendation submitted by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun, III (Dkt. #4). The Court notes that neither party filed written objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time for filing such objections has elapsed.

After careful consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court is of the opinion that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation should be adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects.

ACCORDINGLY, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Dkt. #4) of the Magistrate Judge is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1) is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. The Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #2) is DENIED without prejudice.

4. The Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint consistent with the pleading requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, failing which this case will be dismissed without further notice.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on February 25, 2011.


Summaries of

Hollman v. Hornerxpress

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 25, 2011
Case No: 8:10-CV-2582-T-30TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Hollman v. Hornerxpress

Case Details

Full title:TAMMIE E. HOLLMAN, pro se, Plaintiff, v. HORNERXPRESS d/b/a Aqua-Cal Auto…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2011

Citations

Case No: 8:10-CV-2582-T-30TBM (M.D. Fla. Feb. 25, 2011)